Biology Talk
Biology Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

DNA by Chance?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Biology Talk Forum Index -> Biotechnology
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Siteldawgnumber1
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 2:59 am    Post subject: Re: DNA by Chance? Reply with quote

Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in
news:976st3hjdegh9768dt38otl38ksl48hbnh@4ax.com:

Quote:
On 15 Mar 2008 03:40:24 GMT, Siteldawgnumber1
Siteldawgnumber1@aol.com> wrote:

Hoots <ratty_dew@yahoo.com> wrote in news:UduCj.17790$Er2.15622
@bignews6.bellsouth.net:

spyder359 wrote:
Kathy C wrote:


this must be your higher ethics than those evil theists

What have my ethics got to do with your diagnosing a total
stranger as an "idiot?"

You're an atheist you have no ethics, and you are an idiot.

Yeah, but she's a snappy dresser...


Well, I've seen the pics from the website, she looked pretty hot back
in the day. ;>D

URL?


I don't have it any more. Carol may have taken the site down by now,
what with the ongoing war with Jabriol. She had it up a few years ago.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


~ Säblë ~
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:02 am    Post subject: Re: DNA by Chance? Reply with quote

Siteldawgnumber1 wrote:
Quote:
Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in
news:976st3hjdegh9768dt38otl38ksl48hbnh@4ax.com:

On 15 Mar 2008 03:40:24 GMT, Siteldawgnumber1
Siteldawgnumber1@aol.com> wrote:

Hoots <ratty_dew@yahoo.com> wrote in news:UduCj.17790$Er2.15622
@bignews6.bellsouth.net:

spyder359 wrote:
Kathy C wrote:
this must be your higher ethics than those evil theists
What have my ethics got to do with your diagnosing a total
stranger as an "idiot?"
You're an atheist you have no ethics, and you are an idiot.
Yeah, but she's a snappy dresser...

Well, I've seen the pics from the website, she looked pretty hot back
in the day. ;>D
URL?


I don't have it any more. Carol may have taken the site down by now,
what with the ongoing war with Jabriol. She had it up a few years ago.


It embarrassed her. There she described her two divorces with biker
gangsters. we asked her was God responsible for failure and poor
choices in men. She blew a gasket. And the guy she has now is into kidde
porn. What a failure of a woman.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


pbamvv@worldonline.nl
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:51 pm    Post subject: Re: DNA by Chance? Reply with quote

On 11 mrt, 00:18, Tyger White <bla...@dot.org> wrote:
Quote:
THE DNA molecule does amazing things. DNA fulfills both the roles that
your cells require of genetic material. First, the DNA is accurately
duplicated so that information can be passed on from cell to cell.
Second, the DNA sequence tells the cell what proteins to make, thereby
determining what the cell will become and what function it will serve.
However, DNA does not carry out these processes on its own. Many
specialized proteins are involved.

DNA alone cannot create life. It contains all the instructions needed to
make all the proteins a living cell needs, including the very ones that
copy DNA for the next cell generation and the ones that help DNA to make
new proteins. Still, the incredible amount of information stored in the
DNA genes is useless without RNA and the specialized proteins, which
include ribosomes, needed to "read" and use that information.

Neither can proteins alone produce life. An isolated protein cannot
generate the gene that has the code for making more of that same type of
protein.

So, what has unraveling the mystery of life shown? Modern genetics and
molecular biology have provided ample evidence of the highly complex and
interdependent relationships between DNA, RNA, and protein. These
findings imply that life depends on having all these elements
simultaneously. Thus, life could never have come about spontaneously by
chance.

Although "never" is the wrong word here, scientist do suppose that the
first chemical replicators that later let to single celled beings,
were not that complicated and may have contained no DNA, at all Suche
"life", only carrying RNA would be much less stable, but without any
serious competition, might have survived and evolved long enough to
lead to the kind of replicator that does contain DNA,
We shall probably never be sure, as earth does no longer have a large
environment, containing pre-life molecular soup.

Most biologists are happy to study modern life instead.
There is plenty of that around :-)

Peter van Velzen
March 2008
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


David Flechard
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:55 pm    Post subject: Re: DNA by Chance? Reply with quote

On 10/03/2008, Tyger White wrote:

Quote:
Modern genetics
and molecular biology have provided ample evidence of the highly
complex and interdependent relationships between DNA, RNA, and
protein. These findings imply that life depends on having all these
elements simultaneously. Thus, life could never have come about
spontaneously by chance.

Excellent. Living systems have three mandatory components, DNA, RNA,
and proteins.

What happens to this definition when you discover, eventually, RNA
viruses?


--

David Flechard.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Kathy C
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:56 pm    Post subject: Re: DNA by Chance? Reply with quote

"Siteldawgnumber1" <Siteldawgnumber1@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A64DFB6872A1Siteldawgnumber1aolc@85.214.90.236...
Quote:
I don't have it any more. Carol may have taken the site down by now,
what with the ongoing war with Jabriol. She had it up a few years ago.

I switched ISPs for one with unlimited time and never bothered to set up a
new site.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Kathy C
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:03 pm    Post subject: Re: DNA by Chance? Reply with quote

"~ Säblë ~" [Antonio L Santana/anti-social Jehovahs Witness sociopath]
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:xZLDj.2683$CO3.385@trnddc04...
Quote:
It embarrassed her. There she described her two divorces with biker
gangsters. we asked her was God responsible for failure and poor choices
in men. She blew a gasket. And the guy she has now is into kidde porn.
What a failure of a woman.

And you're into screwing your own kids, lost your daughter to the state of
NJ, impersonate your victims and beat your wife into submission Antonio.
What a failure of a man. There was nothing to be ashamed of on that website
or it wouldn't have been there for all those years.

This is what Usenetters say about you Antonio L Santana (JABRIOL).
You had to move once already because of what you post online and
for threatening, slandering and tormenting people. There are thousands of
these Antonio. And these are from just the past 3 years.
----------------------------------------

"SeppoP" <seppo_pietikainen@xyahoox.com> wrote in message
news:63ust0F294mm5U1@mid.individual.net...
Quote:

Yet more brainless crap from one more Jabby sock puppet...
----------------------------------------


"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:u8cht3l6mbje00l65ermamgdgvo65c2b5r@4ax.com...
Quote:

Antonio couldn't even get a blow job if he had $1000.
Jabbers is so stupid that he assumes that 'oral sex' is 'talking about
it'.
----------------------------------------

---- From Original Message -----
From: "DE" <nowhere@all.disorg>

Quote:
I hope you have read enough of this group to recognize Jabriol as the
actual spammer, whose intent is to disrupt a.f.n in order to carry out
blackmail of a news admin.

-- DE
----------------------------------------

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:6t2rt31mtf2u4ge49tt1g9teigqin1ekpc@4ax.com...
Quote:
If the day ever comes when I find myself in need of the opinion of a
complete and utter imbecile, you'll be one of the first people I ask,
Jabbers. But today is not that day.
----------------------------------------


"David V." <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:seKdnVxO0_HVb0ranZ2dnUVZ_qmlnZ2d@sti.net...
Quote:
He (Jabriol) feeds off of the emotions of others. His religious beliefs
have left him without human companion and combined with Obsessive
Compulsive Disorder, you have a bottom feeding troll.
----------------------------------------


"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:ckubt39n8vvvbm0v22cm1llgsojvthpcjb@4ax.com...
Quote:

I don't think he's eligible anyway. The Olympics are for amateurs, and
Jabbers is a professional idiot.
----------------------------------------


"Budikka" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:b4d6cc22-dbdc-4132-959a-93b05b06fbdd@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
Quote:

I rather suspect that Chaos359 is yet another nym for Jabriol, and
he's a demonstrated coward, liar and hypocrite.
----------------------------------------

Buckler <buckkler@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9dhhmtsrm88etp6qeji0ugtogru2c890h0@4ax.com...
Quote:
Jabriol, you are one of the most vile, horrible, evil people I have
ever had the displeasure to encounter, either in meatspace or the
'net. Have you no humanity? No empathy? No sense of connection to
other human beings in any meaningful way?
----------------------------------------


"Kathy C" <Kathy9045@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:47d7f9a3$0$1345$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
........... he (Jabriol) plagued
Quote:
the support groups telling those looking for support and comfort they
deserved being beaten and raped and suggested suicide. He's a sociopath, a
cruel sadistic psychopath. An anti-social personality disorder victim. He
cannot relate to others and cares only about his own gratification and
satisfaction. He's a misogynistic egotistical sadistic bore.
----------------------------------------


"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:qrg9t3l14l4dljojo98n34aesiu3ml8s0l@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:49:53 +0000 (UTC), Randy Gulley (Antinio L
Santana/jabriol) wrote:

LOL! Whats one more lying nymshifting cunt on these grouops? Stupid bitch
you dont even spell cloaca nor know what it mean.


Oh, shut the fuck up, Jabbers, you drooling moron. Jesus H.
tap-dancing Christ I'm sick of you and your bullshit.

----------------------------------------
"Darrell Stec" <darrell_stec@webpagesorcery.com> wrote in message
news:47d1250b$0$24104$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

Quote:
Jabbers, it seems that analogies go right over your head. I didn't think
it
possible to you to get stupider and stupider by the post.

----------------------------------------

<panamfloyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6104ae27-b4db-4712-9375-53304f4f4a35@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 3, 10:08 pm, jabriol <javr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
a women, who want have plearue only by sex is a slut.. yes.

OTOH, considering what a piece of shit excuse for a human you are, you
don't deserve it. I hope your heart attack happens when you're
masturbating, and the EMTs all laugh at your corpse. The ideal death
for a loser like you.

I'll bet Antonio's so desperate he has to pay his hand...

-----------------------------------------

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:2e5ht3lvck7q0vdr01im13n89ubeqfvi8a@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:30:05 -0500, "Watchtower Aspostate"
Jabbers is a limp dick. He doesn't tangle with men. He goes for the
throats of women. There's nothing K-man could do to jabbers that would
make me feel sorry for him. He deserves anything and everything he gets.
Jabbers has to be the vilest human being I've had the misfortune to meet
online.

I'd have to agree. K-Man can be the most foul-tempered, egotistical,
abusive asshole you've ever met on or offline when the mood strikes
him, but even he has more good in him than Jabbers.

-----------------------------------------

"Syd M." <pdwright42@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6b47a6a8-0a2b-458d-aae8-a59d57893776@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
We all know your a disgusting person, Jabs. You don't need to keep
reminding us.

-----------------------------------------

"Paul Hands" <jphands@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e756f390-c8a3-40b2-812a-c02a35658fe1@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
On Mar 4, 3:31 am, jabriol <javr...@gmail.com> wrote:
every
girl who is not married and gets pregnant,
sterilize her for life. HIV is a death sentence.. let nature take care
of it. no need to spend money on the dead, give it to the living.

I hope you die in agony of a painful infection brought on by AIDS
induced immune system collapse. And we should sterilise the likes of
you to remove your fascism from the gene pool.
-----------------------------------------

From: "Thomas King" <tking777@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.religion.jehovahs-witn,chile.soc.religion,soc.culture.cuba,alt.free.news
servers,rec.ponds
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: To the free people of rec.ponds and arj-w: is Cracklin' your
moderator?


Quote:
And your insanity and spending hours a day on ng's spreading evidence that
you need to be removed from the human gene pool is just as amazing. If
there
is a God, maybe someone will pray that you get hit by a truck and be put
out
of your misery. You are a very sick person. Get a life. Or better yet,
take
your own.

-----------------------------------------

"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:e4o0t3harpc5tg525lslesdshn3k0d7c6c@4ax.com...
Quote:
That was Jabriol, possible the least moral person on the entire
Internet. Ask him about encouraging a suicide on a depression support
group and gloating hen it happened. Ask him about turning his daughter
and grand child out on the streets, Ask him about his gloating when
there's a workplace or school shooting, etc. Ask him about all his
psychopathic behaviour, why he keeps changing nyms to avoid kill
files, and his forgeries of other people's messages.
And he's a Jehovah's witness as well.

-----------------------------------------
Al Klein wrote:
Quote:
On 16 Nov 2006 02:54:02 -0800, "Shadow" Jabriol <vorlon359@gmail.com
wrote:

Other times, Jabbers just loses the tiny thread of a hold on reality
that he pretends to have.

Sometimes, true.

Raped any good daughters lately, Jabs?

----------------------------------------

"Ye Old One" <usenet@mcsuk.net> wrote in message
news:pugds3dtl819avi21o5nj6c3eulc4u6ddj@4ax.com...
Quote:
I would point out that criminals do not need to have been convicted to
be criminals. The criminal (wrong) acts of Jabriol are legion - if he
wants to clear his name it would be up to him.

----------------------------------------

"Darrell Stec" <darrell_stec@webpagesorcery.com> wrote in message
news:47c0be07$0$1126$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

Quote:
Jabroil is a long time Internet kook belonging to Jehovahs Witnesses who
has
been hospitalized several times. One of the things he maintained in the
past was inspecting his daughters' vaginas to make sure they were still
virgins.

He cuts and pastes huge tracts from the JW Watchtower magazine pretending
that they are his own work. He has at minimum 5 different pseudonymous
names on any given day but runs through them as one after another ISP
drops
him.

And those are the good things I can write about him.

----------------------------------------
"Darrell Stec" <darrell_stec@webpagesorcery.com> wrote in message
news:47c22da9$0$30692$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Quote:
Joe wrote:

DROP ALT.FORESTRY, YOU MORONS

That will never happen. It was included by the Internet kook, Jabbers.
Someone must have disagreed with him about some topic on your newsgroup
while he posted something under one of his numerous nyms, and now you are
forever added to his list. You will get a short reprieve when he is once
again committed, but until then, he will continue to include your
newsgroup in his blather.

-----------------------------------------

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:vrv1s35h362lj7jlvc6gsvoit1dcijrgvr@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:45:34 -0800 (PST), Zhragon
vorlon359@gmail.com> wrote:

Buh-bye, Jabbers.

(re-PLONK for the hundredth time

----------------------------------------

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:v83gp3tdgm8c8889err74tjdqv2phjnmgh@4ax.com...
Quote:

Is your daughter still giving BJs for a quarter, Jabbers?

----------------------------------------

"Mike" <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote in message
news:fppa9m$ujc$2@news04.infoave.net...

Quote:
Jabriol [ANTONIO l sANTANA] is a jehovah's witless with serious mental
issues.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Dubh Ghall
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:19 pm    Post subject: Re: DNA by Chance? Reply with quote

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:45:28 GMT, Christ's Love
<christslove4you@yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:45:23 GMT, "John Smith"
bobsyoungbro@yahoo.com> wrote:


"Tyger White" <blanco@dot.org> wrote in message
news:5ljBj.17495$er2.5774@trnddc08...
THE DNA molecule does amazing things. DNA fulfills both the roles that
your cells require of genetic material. First, the DNA is accurately
duplicated so that information can be passed on from cell to cell. Second,
the DNA sequence tells the cell what proteins to make, thereby determining
what the cell will become and what function it will serve. However, DNA
does not carry out these processes on its own. Many specialized proteins
are involved.

DNA alone cannot create life. It contains all the instructions needed to
make all the proteins a living cell needs, including the very ones that
copy DNA for the next cell generation and the ones that help DNA to make
new proteins. Still, the incredible amount of information stored in the
DNA genes is useless without RNA and the specialized proteins, which
include ribosomes, needed to “read” and use that information.

Neither can proteins alone produce life. An isolated protein cannot
generate the gene that has the code for making more of that same type of
protein.

So, what has unraveling the mystery of life shown? Modern genetics and
molecular biology have provided ample evidence of the highly complex and
interdependent relationships between DNA, RNA, and protein. These findings
imply that life depends on having all these elements simultaneously. Thus,
life could never have come about spontaneously by chance.

Thus, in spite of the main body of your post - you know shit!


Ad hominem.

No, just an honest statement, which also happens to be an insult.


Do try to learn what the terms mean, before you use them.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Ipw-Switch
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:07 am    Post subject: JABRIOL TROLL ALERT KATHY C FROGGED by JABRIOLRe: DNA by C Reply with quote

Kathy C wrote:
Quote:



Snipped!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Go away Jabriol.

Please Plonk Kathy C!!!!!!

Jabriol is frogging her IP


PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


~s.a.b.a g.r.a.c.i.l.e~
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:26 pm    Post subject: Re: DNA by Chance? Reply with quote

of course DNA didn't worm itself into existance, what are you
nuts?

S
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Witness
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 12:16 am    Post subject: Re: DNA by Chance? Reply with quote

"~s.a.b.a g.r.a.c.i.l.e~" <veronisc@frisurf.no> wrote:

Quote:

of course DNA didn't worm itself into existance, what are you
nuts?

S

And even if it did. It would have been consumed right away by
bacteria.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Elmer
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 1:49 am    Post subject: Re: DNA by Chance? Reply with quote

Witness wrote:
Quote:
"~s.a.b.a g.r.a.c.i.l.e~" <veronisc@frisurf.no> wrote:

of course DNA didn't worm itself into existance, what are you
nuts?

S

And even if it did. It would have been consumed right away by
bacteria.

Bwahahaha!


This is one for the file!
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


~s.a.b.a g.r.a.c.i.l.e~
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:02 pm    Post subject: Re: DNA by Chance? Reply with quote

"Elmer" <nylicens@frontiernet.net> skrev i melding news:tf9Mj.1525$NU2.1033@news01.roc.ny...
Quote:
Witness wrote:
"~s.a.b.a g.r.a.c.i.l.e~" <veronisc@frisurf.no> wrote:

of course DNA didn't worm itself into existance, what are you
nuts?

S

And even if it did. It would have been consumed right away by
bacteria.

Bwahahaha!


This is one for the file!

Why, its no crazier than all the strange ideas of the evolution delusion theory.
Anything goes there!

S
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Biology Talk Forum Index -> Biotechnology All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 8 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Board Security

109 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group