Biology Talk

Guest

The last time I wrote on this subject, I believe, is the below header:

Newsgroups: sci.chem, sci.med, sci.bio.technology
From: Archimedes Plutonium <a_pluton...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:03:17 -0500
Local: Wed, Oct 17 2007 1:03 am
Subject: #53 can mercury exposure shrink the Hippocampus research ;
new book: Metal Causation coupled with Weak-Protein-Point ^Theory of
Medicine (Alzheimers, Autism, Parkinsons, Prion, Schizophrenia)

So this post would be #54. Every good scientist has to love
organization and order. If not, then you cannot
become a good scientist. The ability and desire to "order things" is
tantamount to being a scientist.

Now why do I add onto this book at this moment in time? Because
yesterday Bob in chemistry posted
a scatterbrained reply about the bee and bat die-off, saying that my
assertions of action needed more
breadth. My reply to Bob was that he is a poor and failing scientist
who can perhaps teach chemistry
and do some chemical experiments but when it comes to actually being a
"scientist", he fails.

And because Bob posted yesterday made my mind reflect back to the last
time that Bob entered a
discussion, which was around October of 2007.

I did a Google search with these terms:
Bob mercury heat prion a_plutonium

Sorted by relevance Sort by date

the energy it takes to destroy Prion disease provides us the
clue ... Group: sci.med
To destroy the prion disease is clear. You incinerate at 700 degrees
C. To inactivate,
does that mean when transplanted into an animal, it procures the
disease. So what
is this reference doing in this discussion anyway? Did you make a
mistake here
Bob by posting it? And there is a big difference between dry heat ...
Aug 29 2006 by a_plutonium - 156 messages - 12 authors

whether Cs or Rb or Hg is the metal cause of Prion disease Re:
the ... Group: sci.med
When the thread is about sterilizing, and Bob enters with something
other than
sterilizing such as inactivation (whatever that means regards prion
disease) ...
If you're going to assume what he has posted accurately, then logic
says that
you have to believe it when he says that 140 C of wet heat without
caustic and ...
Aug 29 2006 by a_plutonium - 156 messages - 12 authors

tell us precisely what metals are inside a good prion versus a
bad ... Group: sci.med
If that were true then it would work without heat (or without much
heat).
But that is not so. It would be interesting to see if the autoclave
fluids would
.... That is simply FALSE. bob Since the mercury and cesium/rubidium
would be
ions, I see no harm and no waste of time in performing experiments
where the water ...
Sep 8 2006 by a_plutonium - 156 messages - 12 authors

burning prions may make them more infectious Re: destruction
of ... Group: sci.med
a_plutonium a_pluton...@hotmail.com sci med sci chem sci bio
technology Bob wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:58:12 GMT, <luca...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: "Bob"
<bbx107.
..... It maybe the case that mercury attaches to the copper atoms in
prion molecules
and is the mechanism of changing the shape of other prion
molecules. ...
Aug 25 2006 by a_plutonium - 156 messages - 12 authors

how do they check to see if samples are sterile Re: focus only
on ... Group: sci.med
Thus overall the big message is that heat -- wet or dry -- inactivates
prion
infectivity with kinetics consistent with a moderately heat stable
protein.
It does have a tendency to stabilize itself ... So it was 1000 degrees
C for 15
minutes and not 600 degrees C. Bob, what happens when you put cesium
with mercury. ...
Sep 7 2006 by a_plutonium - 156 messages - 12 authors

The evidence is mounting against Prusiner and his proxy advocate of
Bob. The Prusiner Model (hate
to call it a theory since it is a fake) posits that CJD and Mad Cow
Disease and these other brain related
diseases commonly called spongiform or Prion disease, posits that the
cause is a protein molecule
that self reproduces.

The last time I discussed this with Bob, I put Bob back and up against
a wall of evidence that Prion
disease is not caused by a protein molecule but caused by a chemistry
poison of mercury or
mercury compound such as Mercuric Cesium or Mercury Fluoride or
perhaps Mercuric Rubidium.

I had argued Bob into a corner because the EVIDENCE shows that Prion
disease needs to be
burned at high temperatures to become sterile. This evidence implies
that the cause is no longer
biological molecules but some chemical poison inside the brain that is
causing Prion disease.
And when cattle are fed the brain remains of dead cattle who have the
disease will contract Prion
disease because the chemical molecule of Mercury Cesium was injested.

Bob thinks he squecked out of the discussion with a victorious answer
that sterilization can be
a biological protein. But I have news for him and Prusiner, in that
the high heat of sterilization
destroys their Prion Protein Model.

I did not introduce another great line of Evidence back in October of
2007, as the evidence mounts
against the Prusiner Model. Another evidence that destroys both
Prusiner and proxy Bob adherence
to that protein model.

Remember the evidence in England of around early 1990s or even 1980s,
sometime in that time period,
where a cluster or small group of people in a small town of England
who were all young people and all
of them contracted a rapid form of CJD. There have been other clusters
of CJD but this England one
really sticks out as evidence that the Prusiner Model is a fakery of
science. In the England cluster were
all very young people who contracted a rapid motion CJD in that they
died in a few years. Up until that time
it was unheard of that CJD can have a rapid motion disease and can
affect very young people.

What does the England CJD Cluster remind one of as a disease agent?
Well, a commonsense person
would say they had been poisoned. To be poisoned does not mean
catching a protein molecule that
reproduces. To be poisoned means that some chemical in the environment
such as Mercury Cesium, or
Mercury Rubidium, or Mercury Fluoride was eaten or drunk by these
England Cluster.

So to people like Bob, who can teach Chemistry and do chemistry
experiments, but when it comes to
assessement or evaluation of a Model such as Prusiner's Model of Prion
Disease, it is people like Bob
who do more damage and harm to science because they lack the ability
to apply commonsense to
the evidence.

We can all understand why Prusiner would back his Model regardless of
the mounting evidence against him
in that 99% of scientists seek fame more than they ever seek the
truth. And where Prusiner can never
reconcile that the Heat of Sterilization and the evidence of rapid
disease mechanism of the England Cluster
point to a chemical poison in the environment and not a biological
protein that does miracle-reproduction.

Also, I should touch on the social background or social environment of
the 1990s that allowed a Fake theory
or fake Model of Prusiner to become accepted. If you look at those
social times throughout the world, the
poison of mercury was very much litigious, that is, mercury poisoning
was very much in lawsuits around the
world. Where even in the USA, the government bureaus of Health and
Medicine denied that teeth fillings of
mercury are dangerous and could lead to Alzheimers, or that
preservative of mercury in immunity shots given to infants was
dangerous and
could cause Autism in children.

So we had a social environment of the 1990s where the entire Health
community and Chemists were
covering up the dangers of mercury and mercury compounds. In an
environment such as this, persons like
Prusiner or Bob would fare well with fake theory of Prion disease
caused by some rogue protein, because
then the real culprit of Prion disease such as a Mercury compound
would not be so big and alarming
to the already worried.

But I am happy to announce that the TRUTH is breaking loose and
breaking free, in that recently a court
case awarded a family of their autistic child which was pointed at the
mercury laden immune shot.

The huge mounting evidence such as the Heat of Sterilizing Mad Cow
disease implies a mercury compound
poison.
The huge mounting evidence of clusters of young people who quickly die
from CJD implies a mercury
compound poison.

The huge mounting evidence that elk species and deer species around
the Colorado region have a high
density of brain spongiform is not indicative of a Protein Only Cause
but is indicative that a Mercury
Compound is a poison and is concentrated in that Colorado environment.

I must say something good about Bob, since I said so much bad about
him, and the good thing he
brings to the conversation is that he does discuss the topics. The
worst enemy of a scientist is not
those who oppose in discussion, but those who ignore and do not
participate.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Tooned In · Guest

LOL, wow what a self-important pompous ass you are!

I do believe that "single atom of Plutonium in the center of your brain" has
passed its half-life.

<plonk>